I currently have some class fu () with some variables that are not shared in all instances of Fu Class only, Rather also by the other class bar.
or
class foo (): __init __ (self, a, b): self. A = A self. B = B square bar (): __int __ (self, A, B): self. A = one will be .b = b One solution will be to create variables of one and B class, but how can I do this during cleaning? Can I put both classes in the same file and give them reference to some global variable A and B? Is this bad behavior?
Since you have not given your intent or real world situation, so the variables reach just for some variables Share.
The first option: Global.
a = b = no square foo (): def __init__ (self, _a, _b): global a, ba, b = _ a, _ b square bar (): def __init __ (Auto, _a, _b): global a, ba, b = _a, _b second option: foo class wars
square foo (): A = b = any def __init __ (self, a, b): foo.a, foo.b = a, b square bar (): DEF __init __ (self, a, b): foo.a , Foo.b = a, b 3 options: legacy
class foo (): def __init __ (self, a, b): self . A, self B = A, B square bar (FU): pass 4 options: external class
class exterior (): a = b = any class Foo (): def __init __ (self, a, b): external.a, outer.b = a, b square bar (): def __init __ (self, a, b): external.a, external.b = A, B 5th option: compsition
square foo (): def __int_ (self, A, B): self. A, self B = A, B class bar (): def __init __ (self, a, b): self.foo = foo (a, b) 6 Option: External function on local variables Termination
def external (): a = b = any square foo (): def __init __ (auto, _a, _b): nonlocal a, ba, b = _a, _b class bar (): Def __init __ (self, _a, _b): nonlocal a, ba, b = _a, _b, #things with foo and bar 7th option: foo Completion of the __init __ local variable square foo (): def __init __ (self, a, b): self. A, self.b = a, b square bar (): nonlocal a, b #do things with another b directly: self.bar = bar ()
No comments:
Post a Comment